Showing posts with label Energy Solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Energy Solutions. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 June 2011

Wanted: Glycerine By-Product

Introduction

Worldwide market for biodiesel is poised for explosive growth in the next decade. The sharp rise in biofuels has created an increasing supply of glycerol.



Glycerine also known as Glycerol has many commercial and industrial uses, and is generally considered a relatively valuable product. In order to both improve the economics of biodiesel production process and put this waste stream to good use, new markets must be found. There are several ways in which this might happen, but biodiesel producers need to make this a priority if they are to reap the benefits of this unused resource.
Biodiesel is a fast growing product in both the United States and Europe as government policies seek to spur the development of renewable transportation fuels. In the US alone since 2004, biodiesel production has grown from 75 million gallons per year to 650 million gallons per year in 2008 (Biodiesel 2020, 2008). While the production of biodiesel is beginning to have an effect on the liquid fuels market, it has already had an enormous effect on the market for another product, glycerol.


When bio-crude goes through the transesterification process to become biodiesel, a significant amount of glycerol is produced as a by-product of the chemical reaction. This transesterification process yields 100kg of glycerol for every metric tonne of biodiesel produced, a 10% yield (Glycerol Challenge, 2009). Total world biodiesel production in 2008 was estimated to be roughly 12.24 million metric tonnes, and this number is rapidly growing (Biodiesel 2020, 2008). This means that 1.224 million metric tonnes of crude glycerol was produced from the biodiesel conversion processes alone. The total world market for refined glycerol was estimated to be roughly 900,000 metric tonnes in 2005 (Impact of Biodiesel Production on the Glycerol Market, 2006). It is apparent that we are already facing a global glut of glycerol, a glut which is certain to worsen before it can improve.

Compare this market effect to the market for one of the major by-products of the distillation of ethanol from corn, dried distillers grains and solvents (DDGS). DDGS are commonly used in animal feeds around the world, and have select additional uses. With the recent ramping up in corn-based ethanol production throughout the world, mostly occurring in the U.S., DDGS stocks have risen sharply. However, looking at overall potential U.S. demand for DDGS, there seems to still be some room for market growth in this area, which will continue to keep the economics of ethanol more attractive until it hits this ceiling and DDGS prices begin to fall. The table attached below shows the global markets for both glycerol and DDGS (Christiansen, 2009). 


These estimates are a simplification, as the true markets are slightly different, but they depict the overall trend accurately. The crude glycerol market is tapped out at the moment, but not necessarily for the reasons that we might initially suppose.

Economic Factor 

This market glut has had a mixed effect on prices of glycerol worldwide depending upon whether one looks at the crude or refined product. Glycerol taken from the biodiesel production process is about 80% pure, whereas refined glycerol is at 99.5% purity, after undergoing a highly energy intensive refining process. With the rapid rise in the availability of crude glycerol worldwide due to biodiesel production, there has been a refining bottleneck, as current refineries have hit the limits of their capacity. As such, the prices for refined glycerol have not varied inversely with biodiesel production, as might be expected. Instead, prices halved between 2003 and 2006, while growing 69% between July 2007 and July 2008 as a result of other exogenous factors (Soyatech, 2008). Prices for crude glycerol, on the other hand, have fallen through the floor, dropping close to zero and even negative as producers are forced to pay to have it taken away from their plants and incinerated (Impact of Biodiesel Production on the Glycerol Market, 2006). This may only be a short term trend, however. Glycerol is not a waste product, and in fact has been a staple chemical compound in the world economy for many years. There is reason to believe that as refining capacity catches up to the supply of the crude product, and new uses for glycerol are found, its price may rebound, potentially improving the economics of biodiesel production.

Uses of Glyrecol 

Glycerol is used for a variety of purposes across many different industries. The following is a list of current uses of glycerol:
  • Food – glycerol is used as an artificial sweetener, especially in low-fat foods, since it is better for blood pressure than sugar. It is also used as a thickening agent and an ester in shortenings and margarine. It also can be used as a substitute ingredient in animal feed.
  • Basic Materials – Glycerol be used as a substitute for petroleum-based polypropelene, a textile, and in both rigid and flexible industrial foams. It is also used as a building block for many different kinds of industrial chemicals.
  • Pharmaceuticals – Used as an additive in cough syrup, toothpaste, skin care, hair care soap and many others.
  • Explosives – The compound nitroglycerin, made with glycerol, is commonly used in all types of explosives.
  • Other – Used as an ingredient in antifreeze, hydraulic fluids, plasticizers (List assembled from many different sources)
While glycerol appears to be quite a versatile substance, one that might be able to withstand slack demand in any one or two categories, it is unclear whether any of these markets possess the necessary elasticity to soak up the extra supply due to biodiesel production. The falling price of crude glycerol could cause some glycerol-based products to substitute for other similar products derived from other sources, but this market shift is not guaranteed to happen, and its magnitude is impossible to predict. But the bottoming of the glycerol market has led to increasing focus on finding these substitutes.

Other Uses

Sheeps being fed Glycerine
  ->As Animal Feed
 
For instance, researchers at the University of Arkansas’ Center of Excellence for Poultry Science have initiated studies that substitute glycerol in chicken feed. The study showed that up to 5% substitution of glycerol in chicken feed showed no negative effects on growth. Given the immense volume of the global poultry feed market, not to mention the entire animal feed market, this is a huge potential growth area for refined glycerol. While this will not necessarily provide direct benefits to a biodiesel producer, since this application depends upon a low price of crude and refined glycerol, this does provide larger economic benefits to society.

-> Energy Feedstock

An even greater upside to the bottoming of glycerol prices has been exploration into its use as an energy feedstock for example as fuel for diesel engines. As reported in TCE magazine in an article "(E)mission Impossible" by Paul Day, John McNeil and Felix Sirovski. 

Problems with using it as a fuel in diesel engines: Glycerine seems to be barely combustible, too viscous and if combusted, produces lots of toxic acrolein which ends up clogging the exhaust with polymers. But these guys have an actual standard 40 kWh Deutz engine running on glycerine by just increasing both the inlet air temperature during engine operation from 60°C to 200°C and mass flow. This overcomes the problem glycerine poses on the diesel engine.

In fact, it was found that glycerine is a better fuel, Firstly because it is not toxic as mentioned before that it is used as a sweetener in liqueurs. Secondly, it is water soluble, easy to wash away if spilled. Thirdly, it is nearly impossible to ignite under normal conditions which gives it a two thumbs up for safety. As for Its viscosity, at 90°C, the viscosity drops dramatically to a level similar to fuel oil of 13 centistokes.



Compare glycerine to other fuels, its calorific value is not that high. Its a mere 16.2MJ/kg whilst diesel has 42MJ/kg and Biodiesel has 37.8MJ/kg. The comparison of prices does not look too bad, in fact, it could be relatively cheaper fuel especially with Renewable Obligation Certificates(ROC) in the UK and other Renewable commitments in Europe. 

Conclusion
The above post suggest that there is still potential for the economics of the biodiesel conversion process to improve if more markets can be found for crude and refined glycerol. This is a valuable and versatile feedstock with many different uses, not only for high-value uses, but also potentially as an energy feedstock which needs for research. It is important that biodiesel producers focus as much on their by-products are their core products if they seek to maximize the value and efficiency of the conversion process. Glycerol production is only going to increase, so it is important for us to find something useful to do with it.

Saturday, 4 June 2011

Biofuel Part IV - Sustainability Issues

SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

http://www.rodomotion.com/2010/08/20/52/

When we are dealing with sustainability there are three common areas that to be discussed namely social, economic and environmental. The diagram above clearly represents the three parts of sustainability, with a brief description of each. Also observe how they overlap and depend on each other to some extent. Sustainability is actually a complex issue hidden by its apparent simplicity.

SOCIAL & ECONOMIC ISSUES


The industrial revolution in UK and USA and rest of the world has changed our social structure and standards of living for the better(mostly). The changing of energy source has a great impact on people’s lives and social behaviour. For example during the industrial revolution, coal was the primary fuel used to provide towngas to power street lights and power most of modes of transport. There is a historic relationship between coal mining and the development of industrialized countries today.

Non-industrialised countries however does not have this progressive stages as they jumped into relatively cheap oil being available in the 1950s which also happens to be the same time many countries obtained independence from colonialism. The world has since moved on from coal to petroleum based fuels which may not be much cleaner but it has made cheap fuel available to the average car owner leading to great changes in lifestyle[1].

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

The production of biofuels could unintentionally lead to negative environmental and social impacts. Potential competition with food crops may lead to increased commodity prices and increased demand for land may lead directly to deforestation to make way for new plantations. Biofuel production are also associated with social concerns such as labour rights, land conflicts and health concerns related to improper use of agrochemicals. Looking on the bright side of it, biofuel demand can create local economic benefits and bring about employment opportunities[2].

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Agriculture & Forestry


Production of biomass to be used to convert to energy is closely related with wider policies and practices for agriculture and forestry. The main consideration with such use is to make sure it is ecologically sustainable. It has to be renewable source of energy which means areas cleared to be used must be regrown later on. Biomass production for energy must not be at the expense of growing enough food to feed the world population which is only ethical[3].

We also have European Union and the USA facing problems with agriculture such as over-production of food, which is actively, encouraged by agriculture 1 subsidies. Such subsidies increase general taxes and the resulting surpluses affect world trade to the advantage of developing countries. In order to solve this problem, the European Union set aside land to maintain it unproductively or for growing biomass for energy. Such policies uphold the social benefits of an economically active rural population while at the same time bring environmental benefits by substituting biofuels for fossil fuels.



A major byproduct of agriculture and forestry is the waste biomass that is just thrown away but second generation biofuel technology can be used to convert these waste cellulosic biomass into useful bioethanol. The undesirable outputs of agriculture such as manure from intensive piggeries or farm animals can be biodigested to produce syngas bringing economic and environmental benefits for the rural population. Successful biofuel production facilities can utilize concentrated flows of biomass such as sawdust from sawmilling, straw from crops, and manure from penned animals and sewage from municipal works.

Developments in energy conversion from local crops are most likely going to be socially acceptable at the same time biomass used to replace fossil fuel use will bring about greenhouse gas benefits. Therefore it is desirable to achieve sustainable agriculture and forestry[4]. However greenhouse gas benefits of biofuel will depend on the system of cultivation, processing and transportation of feedstock.


Pollution


Biofuels fall under the renewable energy category as it is extracted from the flow of energy which already exists in the environment. The energy is then returned to the environment as it burns very efficiently producing nothing more than carbon dioxide and water. Minimum amount of air, water, thermal pollution may occur from material and chemical aspects but it is still in favour over fossil and nuclear fuels[5].


OTHER RELATED ISSUES


Food vs. Fuel debate

This is very appropriate

The main problem associated with first generation biofuel technology is the usage of food crops for the production of biofuels. It can be seen from history that liquid biofuels have been based on biomass obtained from grain, sugar and oil crops which are all important food crops, generally grown on the most fertile agricultural land available[6].

World population increases every year which means more food has to be produced to feed the increased population, those displaced by wars and those are just too poor to feed themselves. It is ironic because in European countries and the USA every year there are crop production surpluses going to waste while in some developing countries where people are starving, crops are exported out to developed countries for revenue. This is slightly out of topic and I am not trying to defend biofuel production but the reason why there is still a proportion of the world population starving everyday is because food is not efficiently distributed around the world.

However increasing worldwide demand for food indicates that these crops should not be diverted significantly for energy production, as we need to set our priorities right which is to eradicate world hunger. In order for biofuel production to be a major contributor to world energy supplies, the feedstock and land cannot be related to food. For example there is a need to push for a cheaper, more energy efficient process for producing bioethanol from easily available lignocellulosic materials such as corn stalks, straw, wood, sawdust and other woody residues rather than from food crops[7]. This will be widely accepted by everyone including the most cynical critique of biofuels.


Support for Biofuels

Bioethanol from corn...literally

There needs to be support from the public and governments of the world to bring biofuels to a whole new level and to reduce usage of fossil fuels. Biofuels industry has the potential to create over a million jobs in the US alone and add over $50 billion to the economy each year[8]. Governments can encourage the use of biofuels by having smaller tax on biofuels than on fossil fuels. This will not be useful if the amount of biofuel blended in the total fuel mix is small unless there is a mandatory requirement for all transport fuels to be sold with a certain percentage of biofuel. Policy changes towards biofuels should be encouraged such as introducing subsidies to producers of biofuel as part of the general agricultural subsidies[9].

 

CONCLUSION

The only constant in this world is change and the influence of modern science and technology will always ensure to older technology. It is hard to predict the long term effects of changing our energy supply but the sustainable nature of biofuels should be a great boon for the world in providing a better socio-economic stability[10]. The only way out of the current situation is to move forward and embrace biofuels technology.


[1] Twidell J., Weir T., Weir A.D., Renewable Energy Resources (2006) Taylor and Francis (2006) Chapter 1.6 Social Implications
[2] Department of Transport – Carbon and Sustainability reporting within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation, Jan 2008 Section 2: Biofuels and the Environment pp 18. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/rtfo/govrecrfa.pdf
[3], [4] Twidell J., Weir T., Weir A.D., Renewable Energy Resources (2006) Taylor and Francis (2006) Chapter 11.11.1 – Bioenergy in relation to agriculture and forestry: pp 389
[5], [6], [7] Twidell J., Weir T., Weir A.D., Renewable Energy Resources (2006) Taylor and Francis (2006) Chapter “ food vs. fuel”
[8] Tickell J., Roman K., Tickell K., From the Fryer to the Fuel Tank (2000) Biodiesel America, The Solution: Renewable Fuels pp 21
[9], [10] Twidell J., Weir T., Weir A.D., Renewable Energy Resources (2006) Taylor and Francis (2006) pp393 

Follow up with this four part series on BIOFUELS by clicking the link below:
Part I,
Part II , Part III, Part IV

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

Innovating to zero

At TED2010, Bill Gates unveiled his vision for the world's energy future, describing the need for "miracles" to avoid planetary catastrophe and explaining why he's backing a dramatically different type of nuclear reactor. The necessary goal? Zero carbon emissions globally by 2050.



Bill Gates - A passionate techie and a shrewd businessman, Bill Gates changed the world once, while leading Microsoft to dizzying success. Now he's set to do it again with his own style of philanthropy and passion for innovation.


Bill Gates is the founder and former CEO of Microsoft. A geek icon, tech visionary and business trailblazer, Gates' leadership -- fueled by his long-held dream that millions might realize their potential through great software -- made Microsoft a personal computing powerhouse and a trendsetter in the Internet dawn. Whether you're a suit, chef, quant, artist, media maven, nurse or gamer, you've probably used a Microsoft product today.

In summer of 2008, Gates left his day-to-day role with Microsoft to focus on philanthropy. Holding that all lives have equal value (no matter where they're being lived), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has now donated staggering sums to HIV/AIDS programs, libraries, agriculture research and disaster relief -- and offered vital guidance and creative funding to programs in global health and education. Gates believes his tech-centric strategy for giving will prove the killer app of planet Earth's next big upgrade.
In his second annual letter, released in late January 2010, Gates takes stock of his first full year with the Gates Foundation. Read Bill Gates' annual letter for 2010. And follow his ongoing thinking on his personal website, The Gates Notes.
"When Gates looks at the world, a world in which millions of preventable deaths occur each year, he sees an irrational, inefficient, broken system, an application that needs to be debugged. It shocks him -- his word -- that people don't see this, the same way it shocked him that nobody but he and [Paul] Allen saw the microchip for what it was." -Time